Open Letter on HMCTS guidance: LCJ responds

Published by

on

Lady Chief Justice Baroness Carr of Walton-on-the-Hill has responded to our recent open letter pointing out a worrying series of errors in published guidance from HM Courts & Tribunal Service on public access to court hearings and information.

The Lady Chief Justice acknowledged that the HMCTS advice wrongly suggested that laptops could not be used in court and noted that the service had taken steps to make the necessary correction.

She reiterated her commitment to transparency and open justice in courts and tribunals.

Aside from specific mistakes like this, the new guide falls short of delivering on the govt’s promise to publish a charter of public access rights that empowers members of the public to exercise these rights effectively, as we pointed out in our open letter.

Given these deficiencies in the guide, it’s welcome to have the Lady Chief Justice’s reassurance that

It is not a substitute for judicial decision-making, nor for the many rules that govern the facilitation of open justice, by which court and tribunal officials are also bound”.

Time and again, the courts have emphasised that public access to court hearings, information and documents is essential for promoting the principle of open justice, yet our experience suggests this lofty principle is not a practical reality in our courts.

As members of the Courts & Tribunals Observers’ Network, we’ll continue to call for more inclusive stakeholder engagement on open justice issues with representation from different professional & civil society groups.

You can read the LCJ’s letter in full by clicking the following link:
Lady Chief Justice letter to the Courts and Tribunals Observers Network

3 responses to “Open Letter on HMCTS guidance: LCJ responds”

  1. Transparency & Open Justice Board announced – Courts and Tribunals Observers’ Network Avatar

    […] Such a committee cannot simply rely on representatives from the media, like previous open justice initiatives, but should also include legal bloggers, civil society, academic researchers and interested members of the public. Without this additional input, matters will be overlooked and mistakes will be made, as experience has shown (an obvious example being the so-called Guidance which was the subject of our recent Open Letter to the LCJ). […]

    Like

  2. […] Such a committee cannot simply rely on representatives from the media, like previous open justice initiatives, but should also include legal bloggers, civil society, academic researchers and interested members of the public. Without this additional input, matters will be overlooked and mistakes will be made, as experience has shown (an obvious example being the so-called Guidance which was the subject of our recent Open Letter to the LCJ). […]

    Like

  3. Exemplary open justice: An in-person hearing at Teesside Combined Court  – Promoting Open Justice in the Court of Protection Avatar

    […] Network reported that the Lady Chief Justice responded to the letter,  acknowledging “that the […]

    Like

Leave a comment